Daisy Meadow

User avatar
Maris
Posts: 886
Joined: 27 Jul 2012, 16:02
Location: Noosa

Daisy Meadow

Postby Maris » 06 Dec 2014, 08:12

Image
Daisy Meadow. Canberra, Infrared

Gelatin-silver photograph on Ultrafine Silver Eagle VC FB photographic paper, image size 19.5cm X 24.6cm, from a 8x10 Efke IR820 negative exposed in a Tachihara 810HD triple extension field view camera fitted with a Wollensak 159mm f9.5 lens and IR680 filter. Titled, signed, and stamped verso.

The Efke IR820 film was old and had lost much of its infrared sensitivity. Exposure was 12 minutes at f32.

Walter Glover
Posts: 1270
Joined: 31 Jul 2012, 22:31
Location: Leichhardt, NSW

Re: Daisy Meadow

Postby Walter Glover » 06 Dec 2014, 09:17

The stuff of enchantment Maris.
Walter Glover

"We see things not as they are. We see them as we are."
Emanuel Kant

User avatar
RoganJosh
Posts: 226
Joined: 29 Aug 2012, 11:26

Re: Daisy Meadow

Postby RoganJosh » 07 Dec 2014, 12:12

12 minutes is brutal. Can't help but wonder how it would look if those flowers hadn't moved.

User avatar
Maris
Posts: 886
Joined: 27 Jul 2012, 16:02
Location: Noosa

Re: Daisy Meadow

Postby Maris » 08 Dec 2014, 10:06

Subject movement, even over twelve minutes, can be a good thing or a bad thing. I was accepting that some flowers would move and others might remain quite still. The ones nearest the camera would show movement more. There might be a nice dynamic tension between movement and stillness. The hazard was that everything would move a bit and generate unfortunate optical pizza. I got lucky with this one; but only marginally.

smbooth
Posts: 405
Joined: 29 Jul 2012, 00:20

Re: Daisy Meadow

Postby smbooth » 28 Dec 2014, 09:57

I like the movement it adds a extra dimension to the image. What was your estimated ISO for the old IR film Maris, i have some in the fridge.

User avatar
Maris
Posts: 886
Joined: 27 Jul 2012, 16:02
Location: Noosa

Re: Daisy Meadow

Postby Maris » 28 Dec 2014, 12:18

The batch of 8x10 Efke IR820 I used had lost a lot of IR sensitivity and my Exposure Index through an IR680 filter was 0.07! That's ridiculously slow but I had the stuff on hand and it wasn't going to improve with more age. By way of comparison I shot a 120 roll of Efke IR820 through an IR720 filter yesterday and the negs look good at an EI = 1. I'm convinced that IR film is unstable even in cold storage and I do regular exposure tests to keep track of it as it slowly dies.


Return to “Places”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests

cron