RoganJosh wrote:Love the first one especially, Nathan. I've never considered the red + pol. combo, probably not so good on windy days I'm assuming.
Thanks, you're not wrong - especially when there's trees/grass which show the movement. With around 4.5 stops of filtration I typically end up with exposures around 1-2s @ f/32-45, long enough to turn the foreground into a blurred mess!
alex gard wrote:I mist ask, what time of day are you shooting? The shadows suggest to me late morning or mid afternoon... I've never had too much luck with my red filters that time of day, the polariser seems to set it off perfectly!
Thanks Alex, waiting for conditions to be right is half the effort in my opinion. Goodness knows how many times I've gone out when conditions weren't ideal and returned with results that I wasn't happy with, I guess a positive of LF is that the costs are such that you only trip the shutter when you've convinced it's worthwhile! Spot on about the time of day, for this series I'll shoot mid-morning and mid/late afternoon, at these times the shadows are long enough to create the depth and shapes I'm after within the image, but not so long as to all end up blending together and losing contrast etc. I think it was Max Dupain who was famous for shooting in bright and direct sunlight, with his philosophy being that the typically harsh light we have is a 'signature' of our country and should be embraced, and that attempting to emulate the more European conditions/softer light did not fit our landscape. Made sense to me anyway. If this is wrong I'm sure someone will correct me!