Walter Glover wrote:Phil Davis's [sic] BTZS system is the only method worthy of consideration.
Alastair Moore wrote: The thing is when I look at my negatives, they look to my eyes to be reasonably correct so it could well be my scanning process isn't quite right. I did some scanning last night using VueScan, Epson Scan and a trial version of Silverfast. They all gave completely different results. Epson Scan was a little too dark, Silverfast was a bit too bright and VueScan was far too bright and contrasty. I'm hoping when we've finished our darkroom and start doing some wet printing, much of these issues might go away. Stupid digital processes!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 78 guests