Walter Glover wrote:Argument, as discussion in a legalistic sense, is indeed a commendable activity which has merit that can benefit the assembled multitude.
But it has been my experience over many years on internet fora that all too often such discussion gets devalued by:
1 Playing the man and not the topic,
2 Navel gazing about the ills of the forum and/or its community.
These attributes serve no good benefit to anyone and just prove to be divisive and become fractious.
Let's all hope that increased levels of argument as Rogan Josh seeks do not stray into heated hate sessions.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest