Postby Walter Glover » 27 Oct 2014, 10:18
Agreed Maris,
It was indeed a deliberate inclusion. In fact, in the second pic (450mm as opposed to 210mm for the first) I did consider a portrait orientation but, as you say, there was a lack of contextual counterpoint.
Cheers,
Walter Glover
"We see things not as they are. We see them as we are."
— Emanuel Kant